- What: CVE-2026-1642 is an information disclosure vulnerability in NGINX OSS and NGINX Plus that allows MITM attackers to inject plain text data into proxied TLS server responses.
- Impact: An attacker positioned between the NGINX server and the upstream TLS server can potentially inject plain text data into responses under certain conditions.
- CVE: cve-2026-1642
Vulnerability Database / CVE-2026-1642 CVE-2026-1642: NGINX Information Disclosure Vulnerability CVE-2026-1642 is an information disclosure flaw in NGINX OSS and NGINX Plus that allows MITM attackers to inject plain text data into proxied TLS server responses. This article covers technical details, affected versions, and mitigation. Published : February 6, 2026 CVE-2026-1642 Overview A man-in-the-middle data injection vulnerability exists in NGINX OSS and NGINX Plus when configured to proxy requests to upstream Transport Layer Security (TLS) servers. This vulnerability allows an attacker positioned between the NGINX server and the upstream TLS server to potentially inject plain text data into responses under certain conditions. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-349 (Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data), indicating that NGINX may improperly accept and process malicious data alongside legitimate TLS-encrypted content when specific network conditions are met. Critical Impact Attackers with MITM positioning can inject arbitrary plain text data into upstream server responses, potentially leading to data integrity compromise, response manipulation, and security control bypass in affected NGINX deployments. Affected Products NGINX OSS (versions prior to security patch) NGINX Plus (versions prior to security patch) NGINX deployments configured with upstream TLS proxy settings Discovery Timeline February 4, 2026 - CVE-2026-1642 published to NVD February 5, 2026 - Last updated in NVD database Technical Details for CVE-2026-1642 Vulnerability Analysis This vulnerability targets the TLS proxy functionality in NGINX when configured to forward requests to upstream servers over encrypted connections. The flaw resides in how NGINX processes and validates data received from upstream TLS servers during the proxy operation. The attack requires the adversary to maintain a man-in-the-middle position on the network path between the NGINX proxy and the upstream TLS server. While this positioning requirement adds complexity to exploitation, successful attacks can compromise the integrity of all proxied responses passing through the affected NGINX instance. The vulnerability specifically affects the trust boundary between NGINX and its upstream servers, where improperly validated data can be injected into the response stream. This represents a failure to maintain proper data origin authentication in the TLS proxy chain. Root Cause The root cause stems from improper handling of data boundaries in the TLS proxy implementation. When NGINX proxies requests to upstream TLS servers, it should strictly validate that all received data originates from the authenticated TLS session. However, under specific conditions, an attacker can introduce extraneous data that NGINX accepts and incorporates into the response stream. This represents a classic CWE-349 vulnerability where trusted data from the upstream TLS connection is mixed with potentially untrusted data from an attacker's injection point. The conditions enabling this attack involve specific timing and network configurations that are not entirely within the attacker's control. Attack Vector The attack vector is network-based and requires the attacker to achieve a man-in-the-middle position between the NGINX proxy and the upstream TLS server. This typically requires: Network access to intercept traffic between NGINX and upstream servers Ability to inject packets into the established connection path Specific timing conditions that align with NGINX's data processing Once positioned, the attacker can inject plain text data that gets incorporated into responses sent back to clients. This can be leveraged for various attacks including response manipulation, cache poisoning, or bypassing security controls that rely on response integrity. The network-based attack vector with the requirement for MITM positioning makes this vulnerability more difficult to exploit remotely but highly impactful in environments where network segmentation is weak or where internal network access has been obtained. Detection Methods for CVE-2026-1642 Indicators of Compromise Unexpected plain text content appearing in TLS-proxied responses Response length discrepancies between expected and actual data Anomalous network traffic patterns between NGINX and upstream servers Client-reported data integrity issues with proxied content Detection Strategies Monitor NGINX access and error logs for unusual response patterns or sizes Implement response integrity validation at the application layer Deploy network intrusion detection systems (IDS) to identify MITM activity between NGINX and upstream servers Enable TLS session logging to detect connection anomalies Monitoring Recommendations Configure alerting for unexpected changes in response content types or sizes Monitor network segments between NGINX proxies and upstream TLS servers for suspicious activity Implement periodic integrity checks on critical