Security News

Cybersecurity news aggregator

🔓
HIGH Vulnerabilities SecurityWeek

Honeywell, Researcher Clash Over Impact of Building Controller Vulnerability

A researcher identified a vulnerability in Honeywell's IQ4 building controller where its web-based HMI is exposed without authentication by default, allowing a remote attacker to create an administrator account during installation and lock out legitimate operators. The vendor, Honeywell, disputes the severity, stating the issue only occurs if security settings are deliberately disabled during a brief pre-operational phase and that the device is designed for on-premises use. The researcher claims to have found thousands of internet-exposed instances and demonstrated the ability to affect control equipment like lighting and boilers even in unconfigured states.
Read Full Article →

ICS/OT Honeywell, Researcher Clash Over Impact of Building Controller Vulnerability The researcher says he has identified thousands of internet-exposed IQ4 building management controllers. By Eduard Kovacs | March 3, 2026 (10:28 AM ET) Flipboard Reddit Whatsapp Whatsapp Email A researcher claims to have identified a high-risk vulnerability in a Honeywell building management controller, but the vendor disputes the severity and impact of the findings. Cybersecurity researcher Gjoko Krstic, known in the industry for his analysis of building control systems and the discovery of high-impact vulnerabilities , recently investigated Honeywell’s IQ4 controller. According to Krstic, the product exposes its web-based human-machine interface (HMI) without authentication in its factory-default configuration. The researcher also found that if the product is not properly configured and a user module is not enabled during setup, a remote attacker who has access to the management interface can create an account with administrator permissions, before legitimate users set up their accounts. “This action can effectively lock legitimate operators out of local and web-based configuration and administration,” Krstic said in an advisory published this week. The researcher warned that the vulnerability could expose schools, commercial buildings, and other facilities that use the building control system. Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading. The findings were reported to Honeywell in December 2025, but the vendor is apparently not releasing any patches, arguing that the IQ4 product is designed for on-premises use and should not be exposed to the internet. “IQ4 devices are delivered unconfigured and are set up by trained technicians before they become operational,” Honeywell said in a statement to SecurityWeek . “The scenario described by the researcher could only occur during a brief installation phase, before the system is active, or if security settings were deliberately disabled against clear warnings.” “At that stage, the device cannot monitor or control any equipment, and there is no impact on operations. Any installation issue can be resolved through a standard reset, and when installed using normal processes, security is automatically enabled as part of a secure‑by‑default design,” Honeywell added. However, the researcher disagrees with this statement and Honeywell’s risk assessment. Krstic said he identified nearly 7,500 internet-exposed instances of the product, and an estimated 20% can be accessed without authentication. The researcher also disputes Honeywell’s claims that the device cannot monitor or control any equipment if it’s not fully set up. “I’ve seen installations where the user account has not been created and I was able to write changes to components like lighting and temperature, turn off the boiler or chiller, and other operations on control equipment,” Krstic told SecurityWeek . SecurityWeek can confirm that many IQ4 interface instances are exposed to the internet, but has not verified the other claims. Krstic said a CVE for the vulnerability is pending. The researcher recently also reached out to the CERT Coordination Center (CERT/CC) at Carnegie Mellon University, which often mediates vulnerability disclosures. Threat actors often target building automation systems in their attacks, according to cybersecurity firms. Related : Critical Flaws Exposed Gardyn Smart Gardens to Remote Hacking Related : 3 Threat Groups Started Targeting ICS/OT in 2025: Dragos Related : Cyber Insights 2026: The Ongoing Fight to Secure Industrial Control Systems Written By Eduard Kovacs Eduard Kovacs (@EduardKovacs) is the managing editor at SecurityWeek. He worked as a high school IT teacher before starting a career in journalism in 2011. Eduard holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial informatics and a master’s degree in computer techniques applied in electrical engineering. More from Eduard Kovacs Madison Square Garden Data Breach Confirmed Months After Hacker Attack Nick Andersen Appointed Acting Director of CISA US-Israel and Iran Trade Cyberattacks: Pro-West Hacks Cause Disruption as Tehran Retaliates Chilean Carding Shop Operator Extradited to US Juniper Networks PTX Routers Affected by Critical Vulnerability Critical Flaws Exposed Gardyn Smart Gardens to Remote Hacking Apple iPhone and iPad Cleared for Classified NATO Use Claude Code Flaws Exposed Developer Devices to Silent Hacking Latest News Quantum Decryption of RSA is Much Closer than Expected New ‘AirSnitch’ Attack Shows Wi-Fi Client Isolation Could Be a False Sense of Security 1.2 Million Affected by University of Hawaii Cancer Center Data Breach Android Update Patches Exploited Qualcomm Zero-Day Iran Cyber Front: Hacktivist Activity Rises, but State-Sponsored Attacks Stay Low Vulnerability in MS-Agent AI Framework Can Allow Full System Compromise Researchers Uncover Method to Track Cars via Tire Sensors Vulnerability Allowed Hijacking Chrome’s Gemini Live AI Assistant Trending Daily Briefing Newsletter Subscribe to the SecurityWeek Email Briefing to stay informed on the latest threats, trends, and technology, along with insightful columns from industry experts. Webinar: Identity Under Attack: Why Every Business Must Respond Now February 11, 2026 Attendees will walk away with guidance for how to build robust identity defenses, unify them under a consistent security model, and ensure business operations move quickly without compromise. Register Virtual Event: Ransomware Resilience & Recovery 2026 Summit February 25, 2026 SecurityWeek’s 2026 Ransomware Summit will discuss a roadmap for defending the enterprise, from mitigating root causes to mastering recovery, giving security teams the critical insights needed to navigate and neutralize today’s ransomware extortion threats. Submit People on the Move Nick Andersen has been appointed Acting Director of CISA after the departure of Madhu Gottumukkala. Predictive revenue system company Clari + Salesloft has named Peter Liebert as CISO. Nscale has appointed Latha Maripuri as Chief Information Security Officer. More People On The Move Expert Insights Four Risks Boards Cannot Treat as Background Noise The goal isn’t about preventing every attack but about keeping the business running when attacks succeed. (Steve Durbin) How to Eliminate the Technical Debt of Insecure AI-Assisted Software Development Developers must view AI as a collaborator to be closely monitored, rather than an autonomous entity to be unleashed. Without such a mindset, crippling tech debt is inevitable. (Matias Madou) Security in the Dark: Recognizing the Signs of Hidden Information Security failures don’t always start with attackers, sometimes they start with missing truth. (Joshua Goldfarb) Living off the AI: The Next Evolution of Attacker Tradecraft Living off the AI isn’t a hypothetical but a natural continuation of the tradecraft we’ve all been defending against, now mapped onto assistants, agents, and MCP. (Etay Maor) Why We Can’t Let AI Take the Wheel of Cyber Defense The fastest way to squander the promise of AI is to mistake automation for assurance, and novelty for resilience. (Steve Durbin) Flipboard Reddit Whatsapp Whatsapp Email

Share this article