- What: CISA director suggests flexibility in agency roles for critical infrastructure
- Impact: U.S. government agencies may adjust their approach to protecting critical sectors
The U.S. government shouldnât rigidly stick to traditional designations about which agency takes the lead on engaging with critical infrastructure sectors, the acting director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency said Tuesday. Sector risk management agency designations have long governed which agency is at the forefront of government efforts to protect each of the 16 critical infrastructure sectors, with CISA responsible for eight of them. âWhen we look at our sector risk management agency construct, thatâs important for a lot of reasons, Itâs less important to abide by that strictly and say âCISA is the Sector Risk Management Agency for telecommunications,ââ CISAâs Nick Andersen said at an event hosted by Auburn Universityâs McCrary Institute. Rather, when responding to cyber incidents or undertaking other engagements with the private sector, the question should be who has the best relationship with a certain sector. âWe may have some owner-operators within a certain critical infrastructure sector that maybe the person theyâre best positioned to receive resources from is us, or maybe itâs [Department of] Energy, or maybe itâs EPA, or maybe itâs FBI or NSA, or so forth and so on,â he said. âWe just have to be comfortable with taking off those blinders and saying, âI donât necessarily need to be in charge all the time no matter who I am. I just need to make sure that this owner-operator has the best partner teed up to lead that engagement.ââ The goal is to avoid another âGuam situation,â where âeverybody was racing to Guam the last couple of years like kids chasing a soccer ball,â Andersen said. Guam was the site of critical infrastructure attacks on U.S. military bases that Microsoft pinned on the Chinese hacking group Volt Typhoon in 2023. An attack on the telecommunications sector from another âTyphoonâ group, Salt Typhoon, prompted questions about whether CISAâs hands are too full with all of its sector risk management agency responsibilities. House Homeland Security Chairman Andrew Garbarino, R-N.Y., raised concerns last year about how CISA handled its sector risk management agency role for the telecommunications sector after the Salt Typhoon campaign was uncovered. The post CISA official advises agencies not to get too hung up on who takes lead in critical infrastructure sectors appeared first on CyberScoop .